Measures › Prevention › High Blood Pressure Medication
Prevention · BRFSS 2023
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure
US estimate 77.0% (95% interval 76.5–77.5), age-adjusted 57.5% (56.8–58.2). Published in the 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 releases.
- Population: All Adults
- Case definition period: Current
- Prevalence (crude and age-adjusted)
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure: CDC's PLACES 2025 release estimates 77.0% nationally (95% confidence interval 76.5–77.5%), or 57.5% age-adjusted, from 2023 BRFSS responses.
Across the 2,956 counties with a 2025 estimate, the median county is 78.5% and the middle half of counties fall between 76.4% and 80.2%; the full range runs from 52.4% to 87.2%. Population-weighted state figures computed by this site (no interval) range from 65.6% (Utah) to 81.3% (Kentucky).
CDC advises that areas may be compared on individual measures but that the estimates should not be used to rank overall health; the county lists below are ordered by point estimate and every row carries its 95% confidence interval.
CDC's definition
A multilevel regression and post-stratification approach was applied to BRFSS and ACS data to compute a detailed probability among adults with high blood pressure who reported currently taking medicine for high blood pressure. The probability was then applied to the detailed population estimates at the appropriate geographic level to generate the prevalence. The 95% confidence interval was derived using Monte Carlo simulation.
CDC's notes: This measure does not include people with hypertension who have their blood pressure successfully controlled through lifestyle changes and without medication. It only measures those who recall being told they have high blood pressure and not those who have not been told they have high blood pressure. This information is not validated against actual blood pressure measurements or medical records. Survey questions are part of the BRFSS rotating core (odd years).
Quoted from CDC's PLACES measure definitions (cdc.gov/places/measure-definitions). BRFSS is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the telephone survey the model is trained on.
National distribution across counties
Crude county point estimates in the 2025 release, 24 equal bins. Deciles: 10th 73.2%, 25th 76.4%, median 78.5%, 75th 80.2%, 90th 81.7%. Counties without a 2025 estimate (Kentucky, Pennsylvania and the states without the social-needs module) are excluded here.
By state
Crude prevalence is the estimated share of all adults. Age-adjusted prevalence is standardised to the 2000 US standard population so that areas with different age structures can be compared. CDC: "Age-adjusted estimates are only available at the county and place-level."
| State | State figure, crude (site aggregate) | Lowest county | Highest county | Counties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kentucky (2024 release) | 81.3% | 76.2% | 85.6% | 120* |
| South Carolina | 80.2% | 76.2% | 86.8% | 46 |
| Mississippi | 79.7% | 73.4% | 84.5% | 82 |
| West Virginia | 79.5% | 73.8% | 83.2% | 55 |
| Ohio | 79.2% | 73.0% | 84.6% | 88 |
| Pennsylvania (2024 release) | 79.2% | 76.0% | 84.0% | 67* |
| Louisiana | 78.8% | 74.0% | 85.1% | 64 |
| Florida | 78.4% | 74.1% | 87.2% | 67 |
| Delaware | 78.1% | 75.6% | 83.5% | 3 |
| Alabama | 78.0% | 74.7% | 83.5% | 67 |
| Iowa | 77.8% | 70.4% | 82.3% | 99 |
| Wisconsin | 77.8% | 74.3% | 83.7% | 72 |
| Kansas | 77.6% | 68.6% | 84.2% | 105 |
| Michigan | 77.6% | 71.8% | 84.1% | 83 |
| Nebraska | 77.5% | 75.5% | 84.5% | 93 |
| Georgia | 77.4% | 58.9% | 85.8% | 159 |
| Indiana | 77.4% | 72.4% | 82.4% | 92 |
| Rhode Island | 77.4% | 76.8% | 79.1% | 5 |
| Missouri | 77.2% | 67.9% | 84.2% | 115 |
| New Jersey | 77.2% | 71.3% | 82.4% | 21 |
| New York | 77.2% | 72.0% | 82.7% | 62 |
| Arkansas | 76.9% | 69.7% | 82.7% | 75 |
| Hawaii | 76.9% | 74.6% | 80.7% | 5 |
| New Hampshire | 76.8% | 73.0% | 82.2% | 10 |
| Virginia | 76.8% | 65.9% | 85.4% | 133 |
| North Carolina | 76.7% | 68.2% | 83.8% | 100 |
| Vermont | 76.7% | 73.5% | 80.8% | 14 |
| Maryland | 76.6% | 74.7% | 82.1% | 24 |
| Connecticut | 76.5% | 75.2% | 78.8% | 9 |
| Maine | 76.4% | 74.0% | 79.9% | 16 |
| North Dakota | 76.3% | 72.2% | 84.5% | 53 |
| Oklahoma | 76.3% | 71.0% | 81.1% | 77 |
| Tennessee | 76.2% | 69.8% | 82.3% | 95 |
| Minnesota | 76.1% | 72.6% | 83.4% | 87 |
| South Dakota | 75.9% | 69.3% | 82.4% | 66 |
| Illinois | 75.7% | 71.4% | 81.9% | 102 |
| Massachusetts | 75.4% | 73.0% | 83.1% | 14 |
| Texas | 74.1% | 66.6% | 85.4% | 253 |
| Arizona | 73.9% | 68.9% | 83.6% | 15 |
| Montana | 73.4% | 67.3% | 82.0% | 56 |
| New Mexico | 73.3% | 69.8% | 83.4% | 33 |
| Wyoming | 73.0% | 65.7% | 79.1% | 23 |
| Nevada | 72.2% | 71.1% | 79.8% | 17 |
| District of Columbia | 71.6% | 71.6% | 71.6% | 1 |
| Oregon | 71.4% | 68.1% | 80.1% | 36 |
| California | 71.3% | 66.7% | 79.2% | 58 |
| Washington | 70.7% | 66.4% | 79.5% | 39 |
| Idaho | 70.5% | 52.4% | 78.6% | 44 |
| Colorado | 69.5% | 65.4% | 79.1% | 64 |
| Alaska | 68.0% | 63.3% | 76.3% | 30 |
| Utah | 65.6% | 59.6% | 77.5% | 29 |
| State | State figure, age-adjusted (site aggregate) | Counties |
|---|---|---|
| Kentucky (2024 release) | 65.1% | 120* |
| Mississippi | 64.9% | 82 |
| Louisiana | 63.4% | 64 |
| South Carolina | 62.9% | 46 |
| Georgia | 61.9% | 159 |
| Alabama | 61.6% | 67 |
| Ohio | 61.2% | 88 |
| West Virginia | 60.9% | 55 |
| Indiana | 60.2% | 92 |
| Arkansas | 60.0% | 75 |
| Kansas | 59.8% | 105 |
| Pennsylvania (2024 release) | 59.8% | 67* |
| Oklahoma | 59.7% | 77 |
| Virginia | 59.3% | 133 |
| Nebraska | 59.2% | 93 |
| North Carolina | 59.1% | 100 |
| Iowa | 58.9% | 99 |
| Tennessee | 58.9% | 95 |
| Missouri | 58.8% | 115 |
| North Dakota | 58.8% | 53 |
| Michigan | 58.7% | 83 |
| Delaware | 58.6% | 3 |
| Florida | 58.5% | 67 |
| Maryland | 58.5% | 24 |
| Texas | 58.4% | 253 |
| New Jersey | 58.0% | 21 |
| Rhode Island | 58.0% | 5 |
| Wisconsin | 58.0% | 72 |
| New York | 57.8% | 62 |
| Connecticut | 57.2% | 9 |
| District of Columbia | 57.2% | 1 |
| Illinois | 56.7% | 102 |
| Minnesota | 56.6% | 87 |
| South Dakota | 56.4% | 66 |
| Massachusetts | 55.6% | 14 |
| Hawaii | 55.4% | 5 |
| New Hampshire | 55.2% | 10 |
| Vermont | 54.3% | 14 |
| Maine | 54.0% | 16 |
| Arizona | 53.6% | 15 |
| Nevada | 53.1% | 17 |
| New Mexico | 52.8% | 33 |
| California | 52.2% | 58 |
| Wyoming | 52.0% | 23 |
| Montana | 51.8% | 56 |
| Washington | 51.4% | 39 |
| Alaska | 51.0% | 30 |
| Idaho | 50.7% | 44 |
| Oregon | 50.7% | 36 |
| Colorado | 50.4% | 64 |
| Utah | 49.6% | 29 |
State figures are population-weighted county estimates computed by this site (PLACES publishes no state row) and carry no interval; they are listed by point estimate, which is not a ranking of states' health. Lowest and highest county columns are crude point estimates. * This measure was not published for the state in the 2025 release; its figure, county count and county range come from the release in brackets, the most recent that has them.
Highest county estimates
| County | Crude | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|
| Sumter County, FL | 87.2% | 84.8–89.2 |
| McCormick County, SC | 86.8% | 84.6–88.7 |
| Quitman County, GA | 85.8% | 83.7–87.8 |
| Jeff Davis County, TX | 85.4% | 82.8–87.6 |
| Lancaster County, VA | 85.4% | 83.0–87.6 |
| Tensas Parish, LA | 85.1% | 82.9–87.0 |
| Towns County, GA | 85.0% | 82.6–87.1 |
| Georgetown County, SC | 84.8% | 82.4–86.9 |
| Randolph County, GA | 84.6% | 82.5–86.5 |
| Noble County, OH | 84.6% | 82.2–86.7 |
| Sharkey County, MS | 84.5% | 83.0–85.9 |
| Sheridan County, ND | 84.5% | 82.1–86.8 |
| Boyd County, NE | 84.5% | 82.1–86.6 |
| Northumberland County, VA | 84.5% | 81.7–86.8 |
| Taliaferro County, GA | 84.4% | 82.2–86.4 |
| Baker County, GA | 84.3% | 82.2–86.4 |
| Talbot County, GA | 84.3% | 82.0–86.4 |
| Amite County, MS | 84.3% | 82.0–86.4 |
| Highland County, VA | 84.3% | 81.5–86.7 |
| Clay County, GA | 84.2% | 82.0–86.3 |
| County | Age-adj. | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|
| Holmes County, MS | 69.9% | 65.5–73.8 |
| Claiborne County, MS | 69.7% | 65.4–73.7 |
| Jefferson County, MS | 69.5% | 65.2–73.6 |
| Leflore County, MS | 69.5% | 65.3–73.6 |
| Tunica County, MS | 69.5% | 65.2–73.6 |
| Humphreys County, MS | 69.3% | 64.8–73.4 |
| Coahoma County, MS | 69.2% | 64.9–73.4 |
| Quitman County, MS | 69.2% | 65.0–73.0 |
| Sharkey County, MS | 69.2% | 66.0–72.2 |
| Sunflower County, MS | 68.6% | 64.2–72.6 |
| Bolivar County, MS | 68.4% | 64.1–72.5 |
| Washington County, MS | 68.4% | 64.2–72.6 |
| Noxubee County, MS | 68.0% | 63.5–72.2 |
| Perry County, AL | 67.9% | 63.6–72.3 |
| Wilkinson County, MS | 67.9% | 63.4–72.0 |
| Greene County, AL | 67.8% | 63.4–71.9 |
| Jefferson Davis County, MS | 67.8% | 63.5–71.9 |
| Hinds County, MS | 67.7% | 63.4–72.0 |
| Madison Parish, LA | 67.5% | 63.1–71.8 |
| Yazoo County, MS | 67.3% | 63.0–71.4 |
Lowest county estimates
| County | Crude | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|
| Madison County, ID | 52.4% | 49.7–55.1 |
| Chattahoochee County, GA | 58.9% | 56.1–61.9 |
| Utah County, UT | 59.6% | 56.5–62.5 |
| Aleutians West Census Area, AK | 63.3% | 58.9–67.4 |
| Bethel Census Area, AK | 63.5% | 60.2–67.0 |
| Cache County, UT | 64.0% | 60.7–67.2 |
| Kusilvak Census Area, AK | 64.9% | 61.6–68.3 |
| Tooele County, UT | 65.1% | 61.5–68.5 |
| Denver County, CO | 65.4% | 62.0–68.6 |
| Fairbanks North Star Borough, AK | 65.4% | 62.4–68.2 |
| North Slope Borough, AK | 65.6% | 61.8–69.2 |
| Albany County, WY | 65.7% | 62.4–68.7 |
| Salt Lake County, UT | 65.8% | 62.8–68.4 |
| Davis County, UT | 65.8% | 62.5–69.2 |
| Radford city, VA | 65.9% | 63.3–68.6 |
| Crowley County, CO | 65.9% | 62.1–69.5 |
| Northwest Arctic Borough, AK | 66.0% | 62.5–69.4 |
| Whitman County, WA | 66.4% | 63.7–69.0 |
| Weber County, UT | 66.5% | 63.3–69.4 |
| Hudspeth County, TX | 66.6% | 64.7–68.7 |
| County | Age-adj. | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|
| Boulder County, CO | 48.0% | 43.9–52.2 |
| Utah County, UT | 48.2% | 44.7–51.7 |
| Jefferson County, CO | 48.7% | 45.0–52.4 |
| Mesa County, CO | 48.9% | 44.5–53.2 |
| Bristol Bay Borough, AK | 49.1% | 44.5–53.7 |
| Hinsdale County, CO | 49.3% | 44.5–53.9 |
| Grand County, CO | 49.3% | 44.6–53.9 |
| Eagle County, CO | 49.3% | 44.7–53.8 |
| Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK | 49.3% | 45.4–53.5 |
| Jefferson County, WA | 49.4% | 45.2–53.7 |
| Jackson County, OR | 49.4% | 45.0–53.6 |
| Idaho County, ID | 49.4% | 45.2–53.6 |
| Davis County, UT | 49.5% | 45.8–53.4 |
| Ada County, ID | 49.5% | 45.6–53.3 |
| Kalawao County, HI | 49.5% | 44.8–53.9 |
| Elbert County, CO | 49.5% | 44.8–54.2 |
| San Diego County, CA | 49.5% | 45.8–53.1 |
| Haines Borough, AK | 49.5% | 44.9–54.0 |
| Salt Lake County, UT | 49.6% | 46.4–52.9 |
| Pitkin County, CO | 49.6% | 44.7–54.2 |
Twenty counties at each end by point estimate. Small counties have wide intervals; many of these intervals overlap one another, so the order within each list is not a meaningful ranking. CDC: "the data should not be used for ranking the overall health of any county, place, census tract, or ZCTA."
National estimate by release
| Release | Crude | Age-adjusted | BRFSS year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 release | 76.2% 75.7–76.6 | 56.3% | 2019 |
| 2023 release | 78.2% 77.7–78.7 | 58.9% | 2021 |
| 2024 release | 78.2% 77.7–78.7 | 58.9% | 2021 |
| 2025 release | 77.0% 76.5–77.5 | 57.5% | 2023 |
CDC's US row from each release's county file, for reference. Survey questions and modelling details change between releases; see the release pages.
Questions and answers
How does PLACES define "taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure"?
A multilevel regression and post-stratification approach was applied to BRFSS and ACS data to compute a detailed probability among adults with high blood pressure who reported currently taking medicine for high blood pressure. The probability was then applied to the detailed population estimates at the appropriate geographic level to generate the prevalence. The 95% confidence interval was derived using Monte Carlo simulation. Population: All Adults. Time period of case definition: Current.
What is the national estimate for high Blood Pressure Medication?
77.0% (95% confidence interval 76.5–77.5%) crude and 57.5% age-adjusted in the 2025 release.
Which counties have the highest and lowest estimates?
The highest county point estimate is 87.2% (Sumter County, FL) and the lowest 52.4% (Madison County, ID). Because the intervals for neighbouring positions usually overlap, the lists are a reference for point estimates, not a ranking.
Is a higher figure better or worse?
This site does not grade measures. CDC groups them as health outcomes, prevention, health risk behaviors, disability, health status and health-related social needs; for prevention measures such as checkups and screening a higher share reports the service, for the others a higher share reports the condition or circumstance.
Where does this data come from?
CDC PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, 2025 release (data updated 4 Dec 2025); the definition text is CDC's own from its measure definitions pages.
Provenance
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, PLACES: Local Data for Better Health, 2025 release (data updated 4 Dec 2025), with the 2022, 2023, 2024 releases for reference; US government work, public domain. Dataset on data.cdc.gov. Boundaries and ZIP-to-county relationships: US Census Bureau. Percentages are shown to one decimal as CDC publishes them; state figures are population-weighted means computed by this site. Definition text is CDC's own, from the PLACES measure definitions pages (public domain), with its burden narrative and references omitted. Processing errors are corrected at the next daily build; see corrections. Generated 30 Sep 2026.